A decade-long problem,
and we're at the beginning of it.
AI is about to enter every clinic, every law office, every trading desk, every place where the cost of being wrong is measured in health, liberty, or livelihoods. The question isn't whether it gets there — it's whether anyone has done the work to make it safe to use when it arrives.
The industry sees the problem. Nobody has stepped up to actually solve it. That's what we're doing — and not just for ourselves. We're building the layer every other company will need if they want to bring AI into healthcare, into legal work, into financial services, into any of the places where the rules are real. Solve this once, properly, and a generation of regulated-industry founders gets to build on top of it instead of around it.
That's the thing we're building toward. Not a feature, not a niche. The compliance layer that makes AI usable in the parts of the economy that can't afford to be cavalier about it.
The work is technically serious and the stakes are real.
It's a problem you can spend a decade on
Identity for agents, cryptographic audit, provable PHI handling, delegated authority, policy enforcement that holds up to adversarial review. None of this is going to be "solved" in a sprint. The people who build the durable answer here will be working on it for years — and the answer will matter for decades after that.
The feedback loop is real
A clinician finishes their notes an hour earlier. An auditor verifies a chain of custody on their own laptop. A pharmacy's controlled-substance workflow holds up to a DEA inspection. The bar isn't a dashboard metric — it's whether a person doing consequential work can trust the thing you built.
No layers between you and the decision
The person who designs the system is the person who builds it, ships it, and answers for it when a customer's auditor calls. If that's how you already work, you'll recognize the shape of it. If you've been waiting for a place where that's possible, this is one.
Someone who reads a regulation and thinks about the system that would satisfy it, not the loophole that would route around it. Someone who's been in a room where a decision had consequences and noticed how rare it is for software to be built by people who've sat in that room. Someone who is bored of work that doesn't matter and has decided to stop doing it.
You don't need a healthcare or legal background. You do need to take the problem seriously, and to want to be good at it in the way a craftsperson wants to be good — not because someone's measuring, but because the work deserves it.
HASP is founder-led. We came up inside regulated organizations — pharmaceutical operations and healthcare workflows touching DEA-controlled processes — and spent years on the wrong side of the auditor's desk, building the kind of evidence and controls that software vendors never quite seemed to understand. HASP is the product we wished had existed back then.
The door is always open.
Whether or not there's a role posted, we want to hear from serious builders who care about this problem. Tell us what you'd want to work on, what you've shipped that you're proud of, and why this is the corner of the world you want to spend the next stretch of your career in. Engineering, security, research, product, design, go-to-market — the discipline matters less than the conviction. Every email gets read by a founder.
Reach out →